Skip to content
Verdiktum

It wasn't 100 million, it's 4 billion dollars for each launch.

Piotr Kosek: "It wasn't 100 million, it's 4 billion dollars for each launch." — True

P

📅 27.04.2026 · Co astronauci zobaczyli po drugiej stronie Księżyca? (a... · 👁️ 3

True. The claim that the cost of an SLS rocket launch is 4 billion dollars is true. Multiple sources, including reports from the NASA Office of Inspector General and White House estimates, indicate that the cost of a single Sp...

"It wasn't 100 million, it's 4 billion dollars for each launch." "To nie było 100 milionów to są 4 miliardy dolarów za każdy stat."
🌐 (Machine-translated — original in Polish) · Original in Polishuage
Factual claim 🔬 Technology AI assessment confidence: 90% 🌍 Global Source on YouTube

Predictions closed

Source (proof)

Plays from the quoted moment

Verification

Analysis generated with AI Pro
Available in the Pro plan Full AI analysis, sources, counterarguments Unlock Pro
🤖
AI-generated analysis: This result is an assessment by a language model, not an expert opinion or a legally binding verdict. Verify sources before making any decisions. Model: gemini-2.5-flash

For informational purposes only. Not investment, financial, legal or tax advice. Full disclaimer

AI is analyzing your argument…

Community Arguments (AI Feedback)

Log in to use this feature

Login

Transcript excerpt

Oryginał w języku Polskim Open on YouTube

zystać te rakiety, ale docelowo do poprowadzenia całego programu Artemis Falcon Heavy byłby niewystarczający i dlatego właśnie powstał mój drogi SLS. Zgadnij ile kosztuje pojedyncze wystrzelenie tej rakiety? >> Ojej, no nie wiem. Jeżeli mam zgadywać, no to rzucam kwotę 100 milionów. >> 100 milionów po raz pierwszy. To teraz cię zadziwię mój drogi. To nie było 100 milionów to są 4 miliardy dolarów za każdy >> stat. To więcej niż >> pleczek z bladu. Wy tego nie widzicie, ale po prostu krew odpłynęła z twarzy. >> To znaczy to [śmiech] ja bym ich taniej tam wysłał. >> Jak za 4 miliardy to byś tak przypakował nogę, że kopem byś tego [śmiech] wiesż wysłał na nie. Nie no słuchaj jakby wiadomo, że to kosztuje, ale kosztuje dlatego, że to jest projekt też polityc

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first!

Sign in to leave a comment.

Related claims by Piotr Kosek

Piotr Kosek Piotr Kosek 05.06.2026
True
"the results delighted everyone, because the material obtained in the laboratory showed a powerful drop in shear wave velocity and a Poisson's ratio perfectly consistent with actual seismic measurements of the Earth's exterior. So, undeniable experimental evidence confirming the superionic nature of the core appeared before us. "
translated PL · original
✅ Factual claim Other
Piotr Kosek Piotr Kosek 12.06.2026
! Misleading
"An international team of scientists working with the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument known as Desi has published the results of their monumental research on the evolution of the cosmos using baryonic acoustic oscillations. When these extremely accurate maps of cosmic structures were combined with those known from cosmic microwave background radiation and traditional supernovae, scientists obtained a clear and unambiguous signal. Dark energy is not a constant value. "
translated PL · original
✅ Factual claim Other
Piotr Kosek Piotr Kosek 25.03.2026
Failed
"We will not wait another six decades for confirmation of which candidate is the correct one. In March 2026, the Indian orbiter Chandrayaan 2 will fly directly over the selected area. This flight is part of an ongoing lunar surface mapping project, so that in the future we know where everything is. "
translated PL · original
🔮 Forecast Technology 2026
Piotr Kosek Piotr Kosek 12.06.2026
True
"When these extremely accurate maps of cosmic structures known from cosmic background radiation and traditional supernovae were combined, scientists obtained a clear and unambiguous signal. Dark energy is not a constant value. "
translated PL · original
✅ Factual claim Other